Part 1 of a 3-part series on Motivation
By: Kellie Fowler
Within every organization lies the opportunity for
employee performance improvement. And, if you’re a
manager or in upper level administration, motivating
your team is a must: it can be one of the quickest
ways to increase the bottom line of your business.
Because of this, a great deal of time and effort has
been invested in motivation practice and theories.
Despite the various researchers who have worked to
understand exactly what motivates us and the
numerous theories that have been applied, one common
denominator prevails: To understand motivation, one
must first understand human nature.
We will dive into the various theories (theory y,
theory z, achievement motivation and two factor
motivation hygiene theory (some of which is touched
on in this article)) in the second article of this
series. But for now, we will work to understand that
motivation in the workplace may best be defined as
performance improvement.
So, just how can you increase motivation, improve
employee performance and sit back and watch your
bottom line grow?
Perhaps we should start with the old saying: “You
can lead a horse to water, but cannot make it
drink”. The same is true for people. Thus, making
the first step in this direction one that ensures
your employees and/or your colleagues want to be
motivated.
While it seems that some people are born with higher
levels of motivation than others, this is not always
the case. In fact, it has been proven that
motivation is a skill, one that must be mastered to
achieve success.
Motivation - A Key Contributor to
Performance
Thus, performance is considered to be a function of
ability and motivation. You can think of it as a
simple equation
Job performance = ability x motivation
Ability is hinged, to some degree, on education,
experience and training. This makes improvement a
continual, lengthy process. By contrast, motivation
can be quickly improved.
There are a handful of very basic, broad strategies
that exist to improve it. These include:
-
Positive reinforcement
-
Effective discipline
-
Treating people fairly
-
Satisfying employee needs
-
Setting attainable work-related goals
-
Restructuring jobs when necessary
-
Rewards that are based on performance
While motivation practices will vary widely from
workplace to workplace, these are the areas you
should draw on when looking to improve performance,
hence motivation.
Frederick Herzberg’s Findings
Now, it's worth going into a bit of theory here. One
can look to Frederick Herzberg, a well-respected
researcher who closely studied the sources of
employee motivation in the 1950s and 1960s, to find
answers relating to job satisfaction and employee
satisfaction. While Herzberg’s studies were
conducted some time ago, they are strongly respected
and underpin much of our current view of motivation.
As he found, the things that make people satisfied
and motivated on the job are different in kind from
the things that make them dissatisfied (or act as
de-motivators), which points to a trend which is
exactly opposite of the motivators commonly put in
place in the modern workplace, i.e. compensation and
incentive packages.
For, as discussed in his classic article in the
Harvard Business Review ("One More Time: How Do
You Motivate Employees?", January - February 1968),
Herzberg determined that spiralling wages may very
well serve to motivate employees; however, it may
very well only be motivating the employees to seek
the next wage increase and nothing more.
In fact, Herzberg’s motivation-hygiene theory, drawn
originally from an examination of events in the
lives of engineers and accountants and later paired
with at least 16 other studies that utilized a
broader sampling of professionals, suggests that
the factors that determine job satisfaction (and
serve to motivate) are “separate and distinct from
the factors that lead to job dissatisfaction.”
Hence, the opposite of job satisfaction is not job
dissatisfaction, but rather no job satisfaction.
Conclusively, the opposite of job dissatisfaction is
not job satisfaction, but no job satisfaction.
According to Herzberg, the factors to consider when
working to enhance job satisfaction and motivation
include:
-
Achievement
-
Recognition for Achievement
-
Work Itself
-
Responsibility
-
Growth
-
Advancement
And the factors which cause most dissatisfaction
(Herzberg's "hygiene factors", which we'll talk
about in the next article) include:
-
Company Policy
-
Administration
-
Supervision
-
Interpersonal Relationships
-
Working Conditions
-
Salary
-
Status
-
Security
So managers should seek to motivate people by giving
opportunities for and celebrating achievement, and
helping individuals enjoy and grow in their jobs.
And they should actively minimize the bureaucracy
and petty irritations that organizations often
unthinkingly inflict on employees.
Herzberg concluded that motivators are the primary
cause of satisfaction, and hygiene factors are the
primary cause of unhappiness in the workplace.
Taking an example: people are often only temporarily
motivated by an increase in salary, however they can
become very demotivated if they think salaries are
too low or if they’re earning less than their peers.
Now, it’s easy to pass over this information without
absorbing its significance.
Instead, pause for a moment and put aside your
current assumptions about other people’s
motivations. Reflect on how you feel yourself. Isn’t
this true for you? Don’t you get your greatest
satisfaction from doing a good job, being recognised
for it, and from growing your capabilities?
And aren’t you most demotivated by the frustrations
of bureaucracy, organizational stupidity, politics
and being “taken advantage of”?
As it is for you, so it is for most other people.
A Surprising Summary
If you’re a manager, you already know that an
important part of your job is to motivate your team.
In so many cases, the level of motivation of your
team is a huge factor in its performance.
The role of motivating or “job enrichment” is, as
Herzberg determined, more than a single project,
instead calling on continuous efforts from
management. In working to do this, managers should:
-
Where possible, enrich jobs so that they
offer a level of challenge equal to the
skills of the person that was hired;
-
Work to ensure those with ability are able
to demonstrate it, and can win promotion to
higher-level jobs; and
-
Understand that the very nature of
motivators (as opposed to hygiene factors)
is that they have a much longer-term effect
on employees’ attitudes.
Obviously, not all jobs can be enriched, nor do all
jobs need to be enriched. As Herzberg concluded, if
a small percentage of the time and money that is
dedicated to hygiene was instead allocated to his
motivating factors, the return in employee
satisfaction and motivation, as well as economic
gain, would be one of “the largest dividends that
industry and society have ever reaped….”
Now, time to put this into practice. How are you
going to motivate your team? How will you make good
motivation a routine part of your approach to
management?
Look for part two of our in-depth series on
motivation in the next edition of the Mind Tools
newsletter.
|